On Mon, 9 Oct 2006 16:49:56 -0500, "Parker Peters"
<onmywayoutster(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> My thoughts exactly. "Parker
Peters"' last example turned out to be
> an unambiguous vandalism sock. I'm beginning to wonder if perhaps
> Parker Peters isn't better known to us by another name...
"Unambiguous"? Hardly. Unless you didn't
bother to read my reply earlier?
Yes, I read it. I also reviewed the contribution history, which is
after all the main thing.
Your definition of "vandalism" seems to be
that you disagree with an edit.
That's not a definition of "vandalism" that anyone at Wikipedia is supposed
to follow, and the last person I met who followed that was a definite pov
warrior.
Nope. It was a POV warrior and a pretty blatant sock. Honestly, not
worth the bytes already spilled.
Now, where are the diffs Jimbo asked for? The last case seems much
more interesting.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG