On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:51:19 -0500, "The Cunctator"
<cunctator(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I have nothing against specialists, but I also see no
reason that they
shouldn't be subsumed in the gaping maw of Wikipedia.
Canonical policies on neutral point of view, no original research and
verifiability?
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG