Removing it is good with the reasons you gave. We don't need lists of
in-jokes. There's still quite a few on [[4chan]], but luckily we've
directed a lot of traffic to external sites that, er, specialize in
that.
Ryan
On 11/29/06, niht-hræfn <nihthraefn(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 29, 2006, at 18:48, Anthony wrote:
<snip />
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncyclopedia#Main_Page_holidays is most
likely not covered by any reliable third party sources at all, let
alone ones off the Internet. That section I'd advocate dropping
<snip
/>
Anthony
That section was removed (as superfluous and "not verifiable") when I
rewrote the article, although regretfully because the information
isn't kept in any one place elsewhere. It is however easily verified
by checking
http://uncyclopedia.org/index.php?
title=Main_Page&action=history (a perfectly valid source and 100%
accurate, a higher accuracy rate than any (most) third party), but
that'd never fly with the RS whores (please excuse my French).
Anyhow, it's been readded, and I'd predict future attempts to remove
it will be similarly reverted and I personally don't think the drama
is worth it.
--Keitei
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l