"Stephen Bain" wrote
But I think his point was something in the interface
saying
that completely unsourced articles are likely to be deleted is
prudent, since everyone agrees that having no sources at all is bad.
What is bad, to look at what WP:RS itself, is having material 'likely to be
challenged' without support. I don't agree that a page of college-level calculus,
known and uncontroversial for two centuries, should be deleted for the pedantic reason
that it isn't referenced.
Charles
-----------------------------------------
Email sent from
www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software
Visit
www.ntlworld.com/security for more information