So what good does an indefinite ban do in such circumstances? A 24-hour
ban to forestall immediate damage is warranted, but an indefinite ban
means nothing when the person won't come back anyway. Look at the
time-frame of his edits. Someone whose 15 edits are all in a very short
period is not likely a long range problem. Someone who has done them at
one per week for 15 weeks, despite attempts to contact him is a
different matter.
Ec
Ryan Wetherell wrote:
Assuming that those 15 edits aren't outright
vandalism/trolling?
--Ryan
On 11/26/06, Fred Bauder <fredbaud(a)waterwiki.info> wrote:
>On Nov 26, 2006, at 6:53 PM, George Herbert wrote:
>
>
>>So far the proposed community bans haven't been that controversial,
>>but it's going to happen eventually.
>>
>>
>Handing out indefinite bans to people who have made 15 edits is
>controversial.
>