"David Gerard" wrote
I suspect our solution to systemic bias in article
coverage will be to
bring in people interested in those subjects. Because they complain
the most about the lack of coverage.
Correct, to the extent that 'equilibrium' is that the topic coverage is balanced
in the same way as the interests of the community. On the other hand, WP is not in
equilibrium, has never been in equilibrium, and (if ever in some sort of equilibrium)
would become a quite different animal.
We basically started with a 'stub' of a really comprehensive encyclopedia. Respect
for stubbiness as a state is the tribute we pay to comprehension of the non-equilibrium
nature of the 'management' issues.
Charles
-----------------------------------------
Email sent from
www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software
Visit
www.ntlworld.com/security for more information