Alphax (Wikipedia email) wrote:
Puppy wrote:
<snip>
> This is not to say that improving and expanding such articles is not
> desirable - after all, we wish to be the premier source of general
> information on everything - but it is not due to gender bias, and to
> imply that it is to me is reinforcing the
> "woman-as-empty-headed-shallow-person".
>
Actually, your argument here is serving /that/ purpose quite well.
? Either I'm misunderstanding you, or I've just been insulted.