Alphax (Wikipedia email) wrote:
Puppy wrote:
<snip>
This is not to say that improving and expanding
such articles is not
desirable - after all, we wish to be the premier source of general
information on everything - but it is not due to gender bias, and to
imply that it is to me is reinforcing the
"woman-as-empty-headed-shallow-person".
Actually, your argument here is serving /that/ purpose quite well.
? Either I'm misunderstanding you, or I've just been insulted.