On Sun, 5 Nov 2006 10:07:42 -0500, Anthony
<wikilegal(a)inbox.org>
wrote:
It seems to me that the type of people with whom
this is an increasing
problem are not the type of people who are even going to read such a
long and complictated guideline, let alone care about following it.
Sure. But it's good to have a well-reasoned guideline to point them
to, and when they ignore it then we can justly point to a consensus
view which they are going against.
But is it really a consensus view when only a small number of
Wikipedians are actively involved, and the rest of us ignore the page
completely?
Ec