[WikiEN-l] We need a policy against vote-stacking

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] We need a policy against vote-stacking
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] We need a policy against vote-stacking
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 2006-05-06 at 01:44 +0200, Steve Bennett wrote:
> On 5/6/06, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Pokemon are massive. How many pokemon can you name? How many uk canals
> > (my area) can you name?
> 
> Zero. Now, if all the people who had put 20 hours into Pokemon
> articles had instead put 5 hours into Pokemon articles, and 15 hours
> into cleanup of random articles, don't you think Wikipedia would be
> better off?

Yes.  Any suggestions how to achieve this?  I don't think that "Delete
most of the Pokemon articles" would help with this goal.

Carl

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] We need a policy against vote-stacking
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] We need a policy against vote-stacking
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]