[WikiEN-l] WikiEN-l Digest, Vol 34, Issue 13

Wed May 3 06:22:57 UTC 2006

Nothing absurd about it, deleting someone's contributions DOES send the signal that that particular contribution is considered valueless by the deleting authority (speedying admin or supermajority of AfD folks).

  Message: 1
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 13:06:02 -0700
From: Philip Welch 
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Cruft
To: English Wikipedia 
Message-ID: <35E13D1F-87CA-4B4C-85E9-37998974110A at philwelch.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed

On May 2, 2006, at 9:01 AM, Kelly Martin wrote:

> In my opinion calling content contributed in good faith by our valued
> contributors "cruft" is incivil. It sends the clear message that
> their contributions, and by extension themselves, are valueless.

Reductio ad absurdum time:

"In my opinion, nominating content contributed by our valued 
contributors is incivil. It sends the clear message that their 
contributions, and by extension themselves, are valueless."

-- 
Philip L. Welch
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Philwelch

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail goes everywhere you do.  Get it on your phone.