I suggest focusing on his political activities. If they are not
notable, the personal details of his life are not either.
Fred
On Jun 23, 2006, at 11:20 AM, Guy Chapman aka JzG wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:17:55 +0100, geni
<geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
No UK law against mention spent convictions.
Otherwise tabloids would
never be out of court. Foundation doesn't have any UK assets and
there
is not reason for any of the board memeber to enter the UK.
That is the crucial question, isn't it? Without the text of the
complaint to OTRS we can't know whether the article was stated to be
biased or whether it was the apparently (but without legal advice not
definitely) baseless claim of protection under ROA.
If it was accuracy there is no reason not to start rebuilding from the
known verifiable facts. Which, it has to be said, are mainly about
the criminal conviction.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l