On 6/15/06, Cobb <sealclubbingfun(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
Why AFD just does not work, or, what happens when
zealots flood a
"discussion" with keep votes.
* "I can't find this anywhere else"
* "Keep and Cite as per Nscheffey. This page is extremely useful to my
Star Wars: Jedi Academy clan, it's no worse than some other sci-fi
entries, it just needs citations!"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightsaber_combat
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lightsabercomb…
Will any admin have the brass ones to do the correct thing and delete
an awful unsalvageable article, or will they count up the votes, wimp
out, declare "no consensus" or "keep" and let an unencylopedic
carbuncle survive?
It is a legit subject. The article can be cleaned up with the liberal
use of machete editing. It would be nice to have something explaining
why the fighting styles are mostly rather stupid but I can live
without that.
--
geni