On 6/17/06, Fastfission <fastfission(a)gmail.com> wrote:
For the record, the Einstein article was only
protected recently
because a stubborn editor was insisting on changing the formatting to
meet his own personal requirements and was revert warring. However
after a week of this he finally agreed to stop after he was instructed
as to how to modify his own monobook.css to make it display for him
how he wanted to. It is currently unprotected.
Why was an article protected to stop a *single editor* from modifying
it? Wouldn't banning him from the article (and blocking him from
Wikipedia if he failed to respect the ban) have been more effective?
Steve