On 6/15/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
The following was mailed to me directly by User:TJive when I asked
Blnguyen to post details of the block to WP:AN
----
Hi, I noticed your comment on the matter of PatCheng. This is an
aggressive and hostile user who has been "wikistalking" me for months
to revert my contributions and post ugly, racist insults (not only to
me but others). A short description of the matter can be found here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:TJive/Wikistalking
More detailed information is archived here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:TJive/Fenriswolf
And the matter was taken up on ANI, and has since been archived. He
waited until it died down to start contesting his block:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incide…
Several administrators agreed with his block, and he has since
repeatedly been caught using more sockpuppets:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&pa…
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&pa…
TJive
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
TJive's created a sockpuppet account, [[User:YINever|YINever]], on May 30th.
He immediatly tracked down and changed several articles on my watchlist,
which we previously fought over, the most bitter over my removal of a
personal attack on the Epoch Times talk page. [
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Epoch_Times&diff=559…]5010411].
From his insistence to restore the the "web
spy" comment, to the userbox on
his user page [
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:YINever&diff=prev&ol…]5876303],
portrayed me not as a legitimate Wikipedia editor, but somehow a "web spy
employed by the Chinese government".
From my perspective, TJive's edits breaches the
NPOV policy, not to mention
his reluctence to use the talk page to solve disputes. I
am not the only
editor having problems with TJive, as he and Blnguyen claimed. TJive used
his sockpuppet YINever as well as his many IPs [
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:No_Gun_Ri&diff=57318265&…]
to engage in an edit-war, which he claims as "defending his right to edit",
portraying me as a "wikistalker". I have not edited as anyone else besides
PatCheng, yet I was the one blocked based on YINever's hearsay. TJive has a
previous history of edit wars with over users Ruy Lopez [
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:TJive/Ruy_Lopez] and Comandante.
Here are some of the disputed content:
* "Castro regime" instead of "Cuban government": [
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Carlos_Franqui&diff=prev&…]7099570],
[
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ladies_in_White&diff=prev&…
]
* Brief description content removed: [
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Profits_of_Extermination&…]7099584],
[
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Freedom_fighter&diff=prev&…
]
* Deletion of sections; incident "alleged" despite evidence, responce only
following user inquiry: [
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Varela_Project&diff=prev&…]7099522],
[
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=No_Gun_Ri&diff=prev&oldid…]7286458],
[
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&d…
]
* Subject of article being a "Nazi", without corrosponding evidence: [
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=George_Bernard_Shaw&diff=prev…
]
* Subject "committed suicide", not "murdered", despite my attempts to
include both: [
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eduardo_Chib%C3%A1s&diff=prev…
]
* Reinsertion of removed personal attacks: [
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Epoch_Times&diff=572…
]
* Article vandalism: [
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gay_Mafia&diff=prev&oldid…
]
* Tiananmen Square protests as "bloody supression": [
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chen_Yonglin&diff=prev&ol…
]
I take full responsibilty for the comments I have made talk pages, and I
regret them. Such are said in anger and in no way reflect my character.
However I feel these are misused by Blnguyen to used to present me as some
sort of vandal and POV pusher. According to him:
''He has complained to me that he has a balanced view and wants democracy
but in the diff regarding inciting hatred, he says that the only wrong thing
that Mao ever did was not kill Jung Chang.''
I don't see anything done to users celebrating al-Zarqawi's death [
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Abu_Musab_al-Zarqawi#DING_DONG], which
someone could also argue "incite hatred against Muslims". Such statements
left by me in talk pages does not, and should not reflect my editing of
Wikipedia articles themselves. In at least three cases I have apologised [
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:PatCheng#Good_afternoon], removed my
comments [
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mao_Zedong&diff=next&…]0179221].
In other cases I was not made aware of my insults, or assumed that the have
already been deleted by other users per the "soapbox" rule. Had I been made
aware of the comments I made I would have no problem removing them or
apologising to the persons affected.
I have already been blocked 24 hours previously for such personal attacks. I
should not have been punished twice, as the current dispute is about whether
Fenriswolf is my sockpuppet. As no links how been proven that I somehow
process "100s of IPs", Blnguyen merely used my history of personal attacks
as an excuse to block me indefinitely.