On 6/12/06, Anthony DiPierro <wikilegal(a)inbox.org> wrote:
But I also don't see why it's
appropriate *for Wikipedia*, unless we happen to have an article which
is discussing the original, or at the very least, the event. (In the
case of talking about the event there are probably better drawings
which could be made, though.)
Exactly - it's being used in a generic cricket article, for which a
wikipedia user photographer could go to a cricket match and photograph
the event in question (assuming a bowl-out happened at that match).
-Matt