On 6/8/06, Steve Bennett <stevagewp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/8/06, Anthony DiPierro
<wikilegal(a)inbox.org> wrote:
What's the difference between the system that
exists now and the
system that existed before, other than the fact that it's harder to
maintain? The proposed pages are still publically visible and
editable - in fact they're *more* publically visible. Why aren't the
people who were overworked with deleting stuff from the article
namespace now overworked with deleting stuff from AFC?
Why bother deleting anything from AfC? my understanding of the process
was that the AfC for a given day hangs around for a few days to see if
anyone can find anything redeeming, then the whole lot is flushed down
the plughole. If we're preserving archives of AfC, then we're probably
doing somethnig wrong.
Steve
Flushing the archives isn't a particularly good idea, because good
articles *do* get lost in AFC. Now, if we had some mechanism to mark
each day as "Done", then that would be another thing.
~maru