On 6/7/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
Sure. An article on "things which have been
referred to as foo" has
no place on Wikipedia. For any thing which may potentially be
described as foo, there will be at least one person somewhere who will
have so described it. So this should be the list of groups considered
cults, with selection criteria set appropriately, or it should be
deleted in favour of a category, so that every entry is rigorously
tested by individual article authors (which will end up in the usual
"pseudoscience" arguments, but that's a matter for consensus building
on the articles).
Making it a category would be an absolutely horrible solution, as it
would remove any possibility of having any footnotes or annotations.