On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 16:43:02 +0200, you wrote:
The problem is basically that "referred to as
cult" sounds like
"everyone thinks it's a cult", but the actual criterion for inclusion
is apparently "some nut once said it was". Solution: Up the stakes for
inclusion to require labelling by some relatively authoritative
authorities
Surely that is the standard which should already be applied, per
[[WP:V]], [[WP:RS]], [[WP:NPOV]] (undue weight) and [[WP:NOR]]? That's
how I would read it, anyway.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG