<snip>
Actually you have repeated yourself so many times, that
I almost believe to
be a disruptive proxy myself.
</snip>
Now you are talking sense!
<snip>
I'd say, that we shouldn't hide the motives for your actions either:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Wikiethics&dif…
</snip>
Who's hiding anything? That diff is illustrative of the very first inkling
of Resid Gulerdem's long record of disruption on the project.
You must realize that apart from Resid Gulerdem's history of disruptiveness
wheverever he goes on Wikipedia (English and Turkish WP) and how his
disruption made a Wikipedia contributor in very good standing leave the
project [[User:Metta Bubble]], the insulting comments that he's made towards
myself (calling me a vandal, troublemaker, etc.) has me somewhat motivated
to see his FULL departure from Wikipedia.
Now with you acting as a proxy for him to further his ends and with your own
disruptiveness (making a list of admins who've committed "Persecution of
Muslims"?) I am beginning to think that you are following his path towards
leaving the project. I would recommend that you refrain from continuing to
act as a proxy on his behalf and that you return to being a positive
contributor for the Encyclopedia before the community's patience is
exhausted.
Sincerely,
-Scott Stevenson [[User:Netscott]]
On 6/6/06, Raphael Wegmann <raphael(a)psi.co.at> wrote:
Scott Stevenson wrote:
On 6/6/06, Raphael Wegmann
<raphael(a)psi.co.at> wrote:
Steve Bennett wrote:
> On 6/6/06, Scott Stevenson <wikinetscott(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> Resid, [[WP:OURS]] was speedy deleted because it fell under
>> [[WP:CSD#General_criteria]] (general criteria 5), which states as a
>> valid reason for speedy deletion : "Pages created by banned
>>
users<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_banned_users while
> they
were
> banned <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Banning_policy>."
This is a much better reason for deleting something than concerns
about copyright.
It would be a better reason, if it wouldn't be just plain wrong.
Neither [[User:Rgulerdem/Wikiethics]] nor [[User:Raphael1/Wikiethics]]
has been created by banned users while they were banned.
Netscott claims, that there had been some edits on
[[User:Rgulerdem/Wikiethics]] from an IP-address he
alleges to be Rgulerdems. IIRC I have made a copy of
that page to [[User:Raphael1/Wikiethics]] before
Rgulerdem even had been banned.
Anyway, even if Netscotts allegations are true,
neither [[User:Rgulerdem/Wikiethics]] nor [[User:Raphael1/Wikiethics]]
has been created by banned users while they were banned.
My allegations? Raphael Wegmann you're so quick to tell a half truth.
Am I? Actually I was referring to your last email, when I called
them your allegations. How could I know, that you are just "reporting"
an allegation by Metros232, when you don't even mention his name?
This MfD started by [[User:Metros232]] which you
were pefectly aware
of illustrates this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Rgulerd…
What about that
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Metros232&diff=prev…
I'd say, that we shouldn't hide the motives for your actions either:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Wikiethics&dif…
It seems rather odd to me, that you now claim, that you are not engaged
in this "remove all traces from now indef-banned Rgulerdem" agitation.
Actually you have repeated yourself so many times, that I almost believe
to be a disruptive proxy myself.
Move along now and cease from acting as a proxy
for a banned user.
Please stop accusing me of "acting as a proxy". I consider this a
personal attack, since it completely disregards my individuality
and the work I've put in WP:OURS before I've created that page.
--
Raphael
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l