Scott Stevenson wrote:
On 6/6/06, Raphael Wegmann <raphael(a)psi.co.at>
wrote:
Steve Bennett wrote:
On 6/6/06, Scott Stevenson
<wikinetscott(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Resid, [[WP:OURS]] was speedy deleted because it
fell under
[[WP:CSD#General_criteria]] (general criteria 5), which states as a
valid reason for speedy deletion : "Pages created by banned
users<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_banned_users>whi…
they were
banned <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Banning_policy>."
This is a much better reason for deleting something than concerns
about copyright.
It would be a better reason, if it wouldn't be just plain wrong.
Neither [[User:Rgulerdem/Wikiethics]] nor [[User:Raphael1/Wikiethics]]
has been created by banned users while they were banned.
Netscott claims, that there had been some edits on
[[User:Rgulerdem/Wikiethics]] from an IP-address he
alleges to be Rgulerdems. IIRC I have made a copy of
that page to [[User:Raphael1/Wikiethics]] before
Rgulerdem even had been banned.
Anyway, even if Netscotts allegations are true,
neither [[User:Rgulerdem/Wikiethics]] nor [[User:Raphael1/Wikiethics]]
has been created by banned users while they were banned.
My allegations? Raphael Wegmann you're so quick to tell a half truth.
Am I? Actually I was referring to your last email, when I called
them your allegations. How could I know, that you are just "reporting"
an allegation by Metros232, when you don't even mention his name?
This MfD started by [[User:Metros232]] which you were
pefectly aware
of illustrates this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Rgulerd…
What about that
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Metros232&diff=prev…
I'd say, that we shouldn't hide the motives for your actions either:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Wikiethics&dif…
It seems rather odd to me, that you now claim, that you are not engaged
in this "remove all traces from now indef-banned Rgulerdem" agitation.
Actually you have repeated yourself so many times, that I almost believe
to be a disruptive proxy myself.
Move along now and cease from acting as a proxy for a
banned user.
Please stop accusing me of "acting as a proxy". I consider this a
personal attack, since it completely disregards my individuality
and the work I've put in WP:OURS before I've created that page.
--
Raphael