Where and how are we going to find anonymous experts?
Fred
On Jun 3, 2006, at 3:06 PM, Sam Spade wrote:
On 6/3/06, Fred Bauder <fredbaud(a)ctelco.net>
wrote:
On Jun 3, 2006, at 12:32 PM, Sam Spade wrote:
process of
competant peer review
Do you have a link to that?
Fred
If your asking where I asked for one, you'd have to scroll up in this
thread. If your asking for a link about one, see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review
If your trying to understand what I'm talking about, I'm asking for a
competent process of peer review to resolve the myriad disputes that
brought me before you. That way we could have quality, peer reviewed
articles instead of personality driven conflicts.
If you haven't noticed, I care about article quality, and am in no way
"rogue". The idea that I should be put on "probation" due to having
had annoyed a popular wiki-personality, rather than that the article
disputes in question could use a thorough review astounds me.
Bottom line, is the wikipedia a web-community or an encyclopedia?
If it is an encyclopedia, can we please stop with all these games, and
find a way to resolve content disputes?
If it is a web-community, I have no interest in it, and intend to
leave.
Your no judge, I'm no criminal, and the only thing on "probation"
around here is the wikipedia, which I will abstain from editing until
this is resolved to my satisfaction. Either way I sternly recommend
you find a better way to encourage your contributors.
SS
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l