On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:45:29 -0600 (CST), "Jeff Raymond"
<jeff.raymond(a)internationalhouseofbacon.com> wrote:
Case in point - something people disagree with gets
twisted into an
entirely separate perception. On this issue, Guettarda misrepresented me
from the start and continues to do so, and the myth persists. Even if I
was wrong - and later consensus on the page decided that long term
relevance didn't exist and I dropped it - this is what defines me for him.
I have to deal with that, and that's fine.
This is indeed a problem. It is quite possible to have a legitimate
difference of opinion while still respecting each other, but in some
cases false inferences (and in other cases legitimate ones) can be
drawn. I'm not going to be drawn on which applies here, since I don't
actually recall the incident. There are some legitimate differences
which are also legitimate bases for opposing an RFA, others which I
don't think are, and position on the inclusionism spectrum is one of
those, in my view. I perhaps subscribe more to the "no big deal"
philosophy than some, though.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG