Yep! As I recall, the first use of a particular <ref> need not be the
"real"
one, anymore. It may be beneficial to start just using <ref name="foo"/>
in
the article text, and then shove the main refs to the bottom of the article,
above or around the <refereces/> tag. For the time being, I suppose that
would cause a few extra footnote links, but surely the problem is
surmountable.
Thoughts?
On 12/9/06, stvrtg <stvrtg(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The apple
<ref name=foo>
{{cite web
|url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/389438794343.html
|title=Foo panel disagress with bar
|first=Foo
|last=Bar
|date=2006-10-17
|publisher=The Sunday Times
|accessdate=October 17
|accessyear=2006}}
</ref>
is red.
Anyone else bothered by how much these clutter up and interefere with
editing text?
-sv
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l