On 12/8/06, Bogdan Giusca <liste(a)dapyx.com> wrote:
Let's suppose we have a small country in a
forgotten corner of the world.
And let's assume that a local English-language website appeared out
of nowhere, with no ads, hosted on the same server with official
government sites (even the same IP!), has obviously the same
designer and uses the same software with those government sites.
That news source could even disagree with the government on minor
point, in order to look independent and reliable. The only references
in the mainstream press (e.g. The Economist) call it an "astroturfing"
attempt of the government.
Would you call this source "reliable", worthy to be used as for
references in Wikipedia?
And if there's a wikipedian who really loves this source, who agrees
almost 100% to it and adds it to dozens of articles, reverting any
attempt to remove it, what should we do?
I appears unlikely that your example is hypothetical what case do you
have in mind.
--
geni