[WikiEN-l] Anne Milton (was Re: Attack blogs in WP:LIVING articles)

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] The vexed issue of sources
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] Anne Milton (was Re: Attack blogs in WP:LIVING articles)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

No new posts, so I'm taking the liberty of summing up.

At one end of the spectrum Charles Matthews doesn't see the need for
mentioning the blog in the text of the article. However, if I discern
his views correctly, he sees it as insignificant rather than violating
policy. His was the only voice against including the blog in the text.

Guy Chapman accepts inclusion in the text, but objects to the link on
grounds of WP:EL and WP:BLP.

Supporting linking are myself, Ryan Wetherell, Luna, The Cunctator,
and Steve Bennett from the list. In addition two recent editors to
the article, Catchpole and The Golux, have either put the blog link
back in or commented in favour of it. (In fairness, Jossi has also
removed the link citing WP:EL and WP:BLP)

Although Charles Matthews argued against the significance, he did
accept that linking to partisan sources was possible providing there
was "a 'shield' of NPOV" in the article.

I sum this up as consensus in favour of including the mention in the
text, and including the link.
-- 
David Boothroyd - http://www.election.demon.co.uk
david at election.demon.co.uk (home)
dboothroyd at westminster.gov.uk (council)

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] The vexed issue of sources
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] Anne Milton (was Re: Attack blogs in WP:LIVING articles)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]