On 12/6/06, Robth <robth1(a)gmail.com> wrote:
For depicting subjects where the creation of a free
image would be
impossible or very unlikely. A non-commercial image would be
acceptable for these subjects as well, but should have a fair use
rationale explaining why it meets Wikipedia's criteria for using
unfree images (i.e. why a free image is not a viable alternative).
Why do we need to resort to fair use if we have permission to use the
image anyway? Surely "permission for non-commercial use" images are
preferable to "fair use" images...if nothing else, we can use them at
full resolution.
Steve