What do you care is someone's called a dipstick? We shouldn't be passing
value judgments, in the most part.
On 12/5/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 11:07:47 -0500, "The Cunctator"
<cunctator(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> What do you think should be the circumstances
under which we link an
> attack blog from an article on a living individual?
When the attack blog is mentioned in the article.
OK, and in this case it's not. What is mentioned is that some
coverage was given in the press to the opposition of Tim Ireland,
including his blog. For that, we have a source: the press article;
and a link: to Tim Ireland's article. Take three links into the
shower? Not me. Especially when one of them calls the subject a
"dipstick".
However, I am increasingly of the view that this incident is not
really significant. Can anyone list the MPs who have *not* been
loudly criticised by at least one constituent?
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l