[WikiEN-l] Ian McKellen's article - a challenge

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] Ian McKellen's article - a challenge
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] Ian McKellen's article - a challenge
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Steve Bennett wrote:
> On 22/04/06, MacGyverMagic/Mgm <macgyvermagic at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>As for unbalanced: I still have no idea what people's fascination is
>>with celeb's sexuality. Anything more than a line unbalances an
>>article. Say what their sexuality is if relevant, put in a source and
>>go on. We don't need entire sections on the subject unless the subject
>>himself has frequently discussed it.
> 
> I agree. I have my own ideas why such paragraphs get written but I'll
> keep them to myself. In general, unless you can honestly start the
> paragraph with "X's sexuality has been fiercely debated",

"...in some bar somewhere after six beers."

Sorry, couldn't resist. :)  In general I pretty much agree with you on this.

-- 
Ilmari Karonen

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] Ian McKellen's article - a challenge
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] Ian McKellen's article - a challenge
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]