[WikiEN-l] The problem with flagging things with {{office}}

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] The problem with flagging things with {{office}}
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] The problem with flagging things with {{office}}
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 4/20/06, James D. Forrester <james at jdforrester.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Using the {{office}} template to tag problem content is a nice idea,
> but, I would imagine, has a rather serious drawback: Wikitruth.info
> (amongst other 'helpful' critics) seems to have a sysop working for
> them. Were we to flag an article that was libellous with {{office}}, you
> can bet that they would go and dig out the deleted sections, and repost
> it to their wonderful service.

Doubtful. Have a look at how mauch of the article has been deleted. In
any case they could get it from answers.com.


You can't hide WP:OFFICE actions because then people could just watch
danny's protection and deletion log.
--
geni

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] The problem with flagging things with {{office}}
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] The problem with flagging things with {{office}}
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]