[WikiEN-l] Wikitruth,info

Thu Apr 20 03:44:50 UTC 2006

On Apr 19, 2006, at 8:17 PM, maru dubshinki wrote:

> I disagree. Vandalism is direct actual damage to our content and our
> reputation, as opposed to possible theoretical damages caused by those
> iages. The abuse of trust is sad, and possibly a moral lapse (do we
> expect admins to never take screenshots of deleted pages, and to hold
> close to their chest any information declared verboten?), but the
> legal argument I'm not sure I buy- the guilty one is the one
> retrieving it and publishing it. We removed it, in good faith. While I
> am not a lawyer, our responsibility seems minimal.

We could keep the contact information of people who make legal  
complaints to the office, and then if/when Wikitruth.info republishes  
the material inform the complaining party so they go after  
wikitruth.info.

Would that constitute disrupting their lives to make a point? Yes.  
Should we do it? Absolutely.

-- 
Philip L. Welch
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Philwelch