Wrongful dismissal cases are often on a contingency basis.
Ec
Katefan0 wrote:
Please -- be realistic. Nobody has that kind of
money.
k
On 4/8/06, David Alexander Russell <webmaster(a)davidarussell.co.uk> wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Like being sued for unfair dismissal or aiding and abetting harassment
>of employees you mean?
>
>Cynical
>
>Katefan0 wrote:
>
>
>>Don't count on it. Companies have their own reputations and bankrolls to
>>
>>
>>protect, anything that could possibly open the company up for harm I promise
>>
>>
>>they take very seriously.
>>
>>k
>>
>>On 4/8/06, Chris Lüer <chris(a)zandria.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>At 10:49 AM 4/8/2006, Katefan0 wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Otherwise, it's just embarrassing -- anything that makes a company
take the
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>time to say "what in the world is this?" brands someone as a
potential
>>>>problem employee, even if the action taken really does no harm to the
>>>>company itself. I mean really, would YOU want to be sitting in your HR
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>office explaining why someone wrote a nasty letter to your company about
you?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Of course not. But I'm pretty sure that the HR department has better
>>>things to do...
>>>
>>>