-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Well obviously if it is clearly a child's toy, then it would not meet my
suggestion ('posing with a _sex_ toy').
Cynical
Sean Barrett wrote:
David Alexander Russell stated for the record:
> If pictured by themselves, clearly part of a
ball bearing, if pictured
> with a child then the point is moot - can you honestly see a situation
> where a child posing with 1-inch diameter metal balls is relevant to a
> Wikipedia article (unless, say, it's in a lolicon article in which case
> the image would obviously be sexual)
>
> Cynical
An article on "Magz," which is a toy based on magnetic sticks and steel
balls. The balls are smaller than an inch, but my point is that someone
out to game the system can game any standard you set up.
--
Sean Barrett | We completely deny the allegations, and
sean(a)epoptic.org | we're trying to identify the alligators.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEOCdsg8fvtQYQevcRAhXTAJ9wBkMsbs99BIuJ3JdgXaz9BMgtGACfRhP9
4d6ZPo/V3iHz4R2WbdUHvDM=
=Buvb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----