[WikiEN-l] Deleting the Lolicon picture

Sat Apr 8 21:11:53 UTC 2006

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Steve Bennett wrote:
> On 4/8/06, David Alexander Russell <webmaster at davidarussell.co.uk> wrote:
>> So, in other words, we need an accepted definition for what constitutes
>> deletable child porn on Wikipedia. Something like
>>
>> Any image, whether a photograph, drawing, or render, which depicts
>> minors engaged in sexual activity or sexually suggestive poses.
> 
> Let's be stronger: Any image containing:
> - elements of erotica,
> - and depictions of people, real or fictitious, apparently under 18.
> 
> I don't really see the argument for being inclusionist. Keeping
> borderline cases causes us problems, and causes us to have to justify
> those inclusions.

Your criteria are ridiculous.  You know how much perfectly legal anime
(which airs on Cartoon Network, among other things) you just made
"illegal" with your broad brush stroke?

Am I the only one who finds it ludicrous to talk about whether a drawn
image on a piece of paper looks like it is depicting someone over the
age of 18?!

- --
Ben McIlwain ("Cyde Weys")

~ Sub veste quisque nudus est ~
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFEOCcZvCEYTv+mBWcRAqw2AJ9JAc7a+1xVLnkmxc0AoYuYYkVuHwCfTgsM
yVdNeB8WvnGIp8rRnRtKcWc=
=Baga
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----