You are pointing to an important problem, mildly suggestive images
are used by the mainstream media to say nothing of the obvious fact
that it is normal for children to engage in innocent sexual behavior.
I think what we are after is those images (and sites) that cross over
a poorly defined line into sexual exploitation of children. I would
say that if some of our readers find an image or link objectionable,
we should not include it. "Some" being a substantial fraction. We
should not be mislead by our own reactions to an image. Having viewed
goatse, our perspective is a bit warped.
Fred
On Apr 8, 2006, at 8:07 AM, Sydney Poore wrote:
Minors engaged in sexually suggestive poses is too
broad Too many
movie
posters and CD (album) covers would be eliminated. Key to this is age
appropriate sexual activity. Depictions of teens or pre-teens acting
sexually suggestive towards each other is okay.
Sydney
Sam Korn wrote:
On 4/8/06, David Alexander Russell
<webmaster(a)davidarussell.co.uk>
wrote:
Any image, whether a photograph, drawing, or
render, which depicts
minors engaged in sexual activity or sexually suggestive poses.
Without wishing to be querulous, we then need to define "sexually
suggestive poses".
--
Sam
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
Sydney Poore
Go Bengals!
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l