[WikiEN-l] Wikipedia broken

Fri Apr 7 18:27:32 UTC 2006

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Yes, but the difference is that verifiability is a policy requirement,
whereas notability is not (although notability is often used as a reason
for delete votes in Afd)

Cynical

Mark Wagner wrote:
> On 4/7/06, Steve Bennett <stevage at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 4/7/06, Andrew Gray <shimgray at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> We require not only verifiability, but notability. I can create
>>> something today and document it today, but - save in rare
>>> circumstances - I cannot prove its importance today.
>> If something is referenced by a third-party reliable source today,
>> chances are it's important.
> 
> I'd strongly dispute that.  Because of the ease and speed of
> record-keeping and publishing, it's very easy to get third-party
> information on something.
> 
> For example, I could create thousands of stub articles on small
> private schools in Michigan.  But I'd describe them as extremely
> non-notable: every last one of them has students from only a single
> family, often only a single student, and exists as a "private school"
> with significant government records only because of a quirk in the
> Michigan homeschooling law.
> 
> --
> Mark
> [[User:Carnildo]]
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
> 
> 
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFENq8Tg8fvtQYQevcRAsjDAJ9dNjIbBgEFPgjn7BWBjlTbBil1GgCfd/kI
AKBVPMs2gxD97cKeMAITJvI=
=6rqo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----