[WikiEN-l] LS Studio and pro-pedophilia pov

Thu Apr 6 15:03:34 UTC 2006

The main reason I posted to the list was to give an example of an 
article influenced by self identified pedophiles. Jimbo's comment on the 
talk page of the article mirrors his comment about trolling during the 
image deletion discussion.

The talk page of the article is leaning toward delete based on the fact 
the name of studio is not mentioned in any of the news articles.This 
seems like a valid reason to delete. Isn't the standard for inclusion in 
Wikipedia verifiable reliable sources not the truth? Forums and blogs 
are not generally considered a reliable source.

You bet I'm forum shopping-if that's what you want to call it. The child 
pornography, child abuse, pedophilia articles need the eyes of 
experienced editors like those that subscribe to this list. This need is 
being pointed out by Kate and others in a different thread. Feel free to 
give your opinion on talk one way or the other.  (I see that you have.) 
Vote delete in the Afd if that is your opinion.

Phil, would you do me a favor and knock off the accusations of pov 
pushing. Let's assume good faith on both our parts and move on.

Sydney aka FloNight

Phil Boswell wrote:
> Sydney Poore wrote:
>   
>> LS Studio is an article with content introduced by editors with a pro 
>> pedophiles pov. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LS_Studio
>>
>>     
> [[LS Studio]] is an article about a porn studio which was closed down. It
> appears to be well-referenced, and only the most obtuse POV-pusher would
> manage to convince themselves after reading all the comments attached to
> those references that the cited stories might be about some other incident.
>
>
>   
>> I'm trying to gather consensus to delete LS Studio. There is no 
>> verifiable reliable sources for the content of the article.
>>
>>     
> You're forum-shopping and POV-pushing. Please stop it. WP:NOT censored. Just
> because something is horrid does not mean we should not have an article
> about it.
>
> Indeed our core mission is to educate and elucidate. This can hardly be
> accomplished by ninny-hammered burying of the truth on the tenuous grounds
> of "Yeeuuch".
>
> HTH HAND
>   

-- 
Sydney Poore

Go Bengals!