[WikiEN-l] request to Jimbo for out-of-process deletion of image

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] request to Jimbo for out-of-process deletion of image
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] request to Jimbo for out-of-process deletion of image
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

David Alexander Russell wrote:

><snip>RFC generates plenty of interest, the problem is that it has no 'teeth'
>- - there is nothing to stop the party who 'loses' an RFC from ignoring
>its conclusions.
>
>Cynical
>  
>
I'd have to disagree - an article I placed on RfC twice, both times in 
two places and a spot on current surveys never received a single comment 
from any of those posts.  And they were up for months.

RfC would have more teeth if more good editors commented on a regular 
basis.  As it is, its hit and miss.

Jareth (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jareth)

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] request to Jimbo for out-of-process deletion of image
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] request to Jimbo for out-of-process deletion of image
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]