[WikiEN-l] What surprised me about Britannica's response to Nature...

Wed Apr 5 06:42:23 UTC 2006

On 4/5/06, Daniel Mayer <maveric149 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Britannica's products with Wikipedia. Not to mention that the reviewers were blind to the source
> of what they were reading and thus there was little to no opportunity for bias on that level.

I seem to recally from the original report a quote saying the
reviewers, in practice, did know which one they were reading, because
the styles were so different. Am I misremembering?

Steve