On 9/30/05, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/30/05, Tony Sidaway <f.crdfa(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Actually I don't think it can be fixed. I am
convinced that it could be
safely wound down provided a procedure for dealing with hoax/unverifiable
articles was instituted along the same lines as
Wikipedia:Copyright_Problems.
Sorry I thought people wanted a system which worked. WP:CP is
improveing but it still has a long way to go.
--
geni
Perhaps I'm completely oblivious, but WP:CP seems to work fine from
where I'm standing. The only problem it has is the immense backlogs it
gets every once in a while, but that can be resolved by encouraging
people to maintain it. The process itself doesn't appear to "have a
long way to go" or am I missing something.
About deletion: There's a simple way to avoid repeated run-ins with
AFD. Write better articles that even hard-core deletionists wouldn't
think of deleting. One or 2 lines more in a stub can make the
difference between viable context or possible deletion candidate.
--Mgm