On 9/30/05, JAY JG <jayjg(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
From: Tony
Sidaway <f.crdfa(a)gmail.com>
Deletion policy states explicitly that if the only problem with an article
is that it's on a branch of a subject so trivial that it doesn't merit an
article, it is *not* a candidate for deletion, but should be merged to a
more comprehensive article.
This isn't only policy, it's also a pretty sensible argument for merging.
Sometimes information is so trivial that there is no merit in having it in
any article. Remember, these are encyclopedia articles, not accumulations
of random facts.
Wouldn't you agree that whether something is too trivial or not is
best determined by the editors who review the merge target?
Surely those who best know Clarendon Hills, IL, are the ones best
suited to know whether a specific intersection in Clarendon Hills is
notable or not.
--
Michael Turley
User:Unfocused