Zephram Stark stated for the record:
The above is a bold statement that would require
considerable risk to implement, but it is exactly the same concept that the founders of my
country pledged their "Lives," "Fortunes," and "sacred
Honor" to protect. I submit that my nation, the United States of America, is a
success because they did so.
Ohhh ... invocation of American Framers ... must immediately stop
thinking and mindlessly comply ....
It is possible to write the programming code for
Wikipedia so that no administrators are necessary and so that nobody can gain undue
influence over an article. I would be happy to write this code for free if we can all
agree that it will be implemented.
<div id="trollfood">
We do not agree, so why don't you prove yourself by just forking off? I
assure you, once your Utopipedia has eclipsed Wikipedia, we will come
crawling to you on our knees begging you to let us bask in your
brilliance. Until then, we'll stumble along in our blighted ignorance.
</div>
So the guy wants a more libertarian Wikipedia. So he's not very
concise about stating his view. No big deal. It's also obvious that
a consensus doesn't support his view, but in stating it, he hasn't
hurt anyone.
I don't see the point of your response. It does no good at all.
"Courtesy in the face of any insult" is a useful concept. "Courtesy
in the face of any troll" works well, too.
--
Michael Turley
User:Unfocused