"Chris Lüer" <chris(a)zandria.net> wrote in
message news:6.2.3.4.2.20050919093012.03d15dd8@mail.zandria.net...
[snip]
An example of what I'm thinking of: [[Attila the
Hun]] has a whole bunch
of pictures of Attila -- but all of them are fictional. To the credit of
the article, it is actually mentioned that there are no real pictures of
him. But this is way at the end, and the first fictional picture is at the
very beginning of the article. Unexperienced readers that don't read all
the way to the end might be misled into accepting these pictures as
factual representations.
Proper captions should help: does the caption for that picture not give
proper attribution? {{sofixit}}
Shouldn't the same encyclopedic standards we have
for text be applied to
images, too?
Yes.
--
Phil
[[en:User:Phil Boswell]]