[WikiEN-l] Re: Delete IAR

Mon Sep 19 21:59:50 UTC 2005

This only went to steve, oops.

On 9/19/05, Phroziac <phroziac at gmail.com> wrote:
> But IAR is *good*. We aren't overly legalistic, bureaucratic, etc.
> 
> On 9/19/05, steve v <vertigosteve at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Due to a widespread confusion regarding the
> > application of IAR as a policy, rather than simply an
> > informal guideline, I propose deleting the third leg
> > of the so-called policy trifecta.
> >
> > NPOV was always the prime directive, and some tussles
> > we came up with the word "civility"(*) to shape a good
> > secondary. The third leg, although necessary to
> > satisfy the requirements of standing furniture and
> > designated "trifecta" was never quite as clear.
> > Perhaps we should vote if there is actually a third,
> > and if so what that should be. Drawing from a list of
> > actual policy, of course and not just this "flimsy
> > whimsy trumps policy history" nonsense.
> >
> > SV
> > *
> > http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2003-October/007069.html
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
>