Personally, I don't see any advantages either unless their account was
hacked into. It only makes returning to admin duties harder.
If I were to go away for a few months because I have other obligations
in my life, I'd hate to spend extra time trying to find a bureaucrat
to get me back to admin status.
It only creates extra work.
--Mgm
On 9/19/05, Stephen Bain <stephen.bain(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/19/05, Ryan W. (Merovingian)
<bigwiki(a)earthling.net> wrote:
It's not a bad idea, but I don't see it
as necessary unless:
1. An inactive account was hacked into.
2, If the admin in question requests it.
The only reason I can think of would be that having inactive admins on
the books might inflate admin numbers, but we already have [[WP:LA]],
which is split into "active", "semi-active" and "inactive"
groups as
it is.
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.bain(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l