On 9/19/05, Ryan W. (Merovingian) <bigwiki(a)earthling.net> wrote:
It's not a bad idea, but I don't see it as
necessary unless:
1. An inactive account was hacked into.
2, If the admin in question requests it.
The only reason I can think of would be that having inactive admins on
the books might inflate admin numbers, but we already have [[WP:LA]],
which is split into "active", "semi-active" and "inactive"
groups as
it is.
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.bain(a)gmail.com