I don't see how people can form a valid opinion about undeleting an
article if they can't compare the original AFD/VFD against the article
that was deleted. Temporary undeletion may even uncover additional
research that could seal an undeletion without doubt.
There may be consensus to delete, but if the last vote went against
consensus and provided a valid reason, the reason "AFD was valid"
makes no sense at all.
--Mgm
On 9/16/05, Tony Sidaway <f.crdfa(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/16/05, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I wasn't suggesting you restore it I was jsuting seeing how you could
mess with the rules to atchive odd results.
Er, thanks but no thanks. I know VFU is a bit weird at the moment, but that
no excuse for taking an article deleted in process through AfD again, for a
post-mortem rerun.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l