On 9/16/05, Tony Sidaway <f.crdfa(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Oh but it is. That is one of my key points: an argument improperly neglected
(for instance, if conditions mentioned in the original nomination have been
met--which is grounds for a keep result unless there is some overriding
reason to delete, such as a copyright violation). Or say an editor finds
that an article has been deleted while he was otherwise occupied, and he
raises the necessary undelete quorum. Or perhaps the article was deleted by
a consensus on AfD despite the well documented fact that the subject was the
President of Mauritania for six months.
I don't think there is anything in policy to stop you relisting a
deleted article on AFD. could be interesting to try.
--
geni