On 9/16/05, Phroziac <phroziac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/16/05, Guettarda <guettarda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
The very thought of speedying a halfway decent
stub strikes me as both a
very bad idea, and very dangerous to the encyclopaedia. How many featured
articles started out as stubs?
While I agree, you *did* see the size of those
stubs, right? Two more
sentences and I doubt they would have been speedied. Probably put on
afd though. We really should encourage adding more information in one
edit.
Indeed, those articles were stubs as they contained more than just one
tiny sentence. We should indeed encourage more than one-sentence edits
to start articles. One sentence is not a stub but a substub.