[WikiEN-l] On notability and speedies
Alphax
alphasigmax at gmail.com
Fri Sep 16 01:28:54 UTC 2005
Keith Old wrote:
> Oops, I did it again. What I meant to say is that if a user wishes to vote
> for a speedy delete on the grounds that an article does not assert
> notability it should open for him or her to do so.
>
> As to the more important issue that you raised, notability is in my view a
> central point as AfD has evolved. For example, I could write an article on
> the street where I live. It is in street directories and the ACT Department
> of Urban Services has a directory of street names saying how each street in
> Canberra got its name. There is verifiable information as to when it was
> built I could even write that I lived there because I am in the electoral
> roll which is another source of verifiable information.
>
> The point is that my street is probably not of any interest to anyone living
> outside the suburb of Hughes in the ACT, Australia and there shouldn't be an
> article on it in Wikipedia. Thus notability has evolved to be a key issue as
> to whether or not articles are worthy of retention.
Feel free to add this information to [[Hughes, Australian Capital
Territory]].
--
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list